How-to Avoid Username Enumeration | Secure Code Warrior
A side-channel attack is when a hacker can gather information from the physical implementation of a software system rather than a theoretical weakness in the algorithm or bug in the code of the software.
An example I like to use to make this more clear is a way to do username enumeration. If you want to know what username enumeration is or why it is bad, visit our website for a video explanation or play a challenge to see if you can identify it in code.
Now in order to understand how username enumeration can be done through a side-channel attack, you need to have some understanding of how passwords are (or at least should be) handled in modern web applications. A good web application doesn't know your password, it doesn't save or store your password anywhere. So how does it know that what you typed is correct and in fact your password? Well, your password is hashed.
A hashing function is a mathematical operation that is easy to perform one way (although somewhat computationally expensive) but very difficult to reverse and for good hashing algorithms, the output is unique depending on the input. When you register on a website, that hash is stored safely, not your password itself. That means that every time you log-in, the web application hashes your input and compares the hashed results to the stored hash. If you want to learn more about secure password storage, you can do that on our platform.
Hashing input takes some time on a computer and developers always try to optimize everything they write in order for the users to have a smooth experience. One thing that speeds up the program is to skip the hashing when it is not needed. For example, when the username does not exist (and so no password needs to be checked) they can respond to the user immediately. This way they can skip the slow computation of hashing the password. If the username was correct they will hash the password input and compare that to the stored hash.
At this point, you might have guessed where things can go wrong. Even though in reality the hashing takes only a few milliseconds, a hacker can use this added delay to find out if the username he entered was correct or not since a wrong username will have a slightly faster response because no hashing was done. This type of side-channel attack is called a timing attack and it is a good example for how different non-functional requirements can counteract each other. Sometimes code cannot be fast and secure at the same time.
So even though the passwords are handled perfectly, and the message that is displayed is generic and does not advise whether the password or username was incorrect, the system is still vulnerable. The solution is easy, always hash the password or delay sending the reply the time it would take to hash.
The information obtained can be used by an attacker to gain a list of users on system. This information can be used to attack the web application, for example, through a brute force or default username/password attack.
Username enumeration is when hackers use brute-force attacks to get username & password info. Learn how to avoid username enumeration with Secure Code Warrior.
Application Security Researcher - R&D Engineer - PhD Candidate
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
Book a demo
Application Security Researcher - R&D Engineer - PhD Candidate
A side-channel attack is when a hacker can gather information from the physical implementation of a software system rather than a theoretical weakness in the algorithm or bug in the code of the software.
An example I like to use to make this more clear is a way to do username enumeration. If you want to know what username enumeration is or why it is bad, visit our website for a video explanation or play a challenge to see if you can identify it in code.
Now in order to understand how username enumeration can be done through a side-channel attack, you need to have some understanding of how passwords are (or at least should be) handled in modern web applications. A good web application doesn't know your password, it doesn't save or store your password anywhere. So how does it know that what you typed is correct and in fact your password? Well, your password is hashed.
A hashing function is a mathematical operation that is easy to perform one way (although somewhat computationally expensive) but very difficult to reverse and for good hashing algorithms, the output is unique depending on the input. When you register on a website, that hash is stored safely, not your password itself. That means that every time you log-in, the web application hashes your input and compares the hashed results to the stored hash. If you want to learn more about secure password storage, you can do that on our platform.
Hashing input takes some time on a computer and developers always try to optimize everything they write in order for the users to have a smooth experience. One thing that speeds up the program is to skip the hashing when it is not needed. For example, when the username does not exist (and so no password needs to be checked) they can respond to the user immediately. This way they can skip the slow computation of hashing the password. If the username was correct they will hash the password input and compare that to the stored hash.
At this point, you might have guessed where things can go wrong. Even though in reality the hashing takes only a few milliseconds, a hacker can use this added delay to find out if the username he entered was correct or not since a wrong username will have a slightly faster response because no hashing was done. This type of side-channel attack is called a timing attack and it is a good example for how different non-functional requirements can counteract each other. Sometimes code cannot be fast and secure at the same time.
So even though the passwords are handled perfectly, and the message that is displayed is generic and does not advise whether the password or username was incorrect, the system is still vulnerable. The solution is easy, always hash the password or delay sending the reply the time it would take to hash.
The information obtained can be used by an attacker to gain a list of users on system. This information can be used to attack the web application, for example, through a brute force or default username/password attack.
A side-channel attack is when a hacker can gather information from the physical implementation of a software system rather than a theoretical weakness in the algorithm or bug in the code of the software.
An example I like to use to make this more clear is a way to do username enumeration. If you want to know what username enumeration is or why it is bad, visit our website for a video explanation or play a challenge to see if you can identify it in code.
Now in order to understand how username enumeration can be done through a side-channel attack, you need to have some understanding of how passwords are (or at least should be) handled in modern web applications. A good web application doesn't know your password, it doesn't save or store your password anywhere. So how does it know that what you typed is correct and in fact your password? Well, your password is hashed.
A hashing function is a mathematical operation that is easy to perform one way (although somewhat computationally expensive) but very difficult to reverse and for good hashing algorithms, the output is unique depending on the input. When you register on a website, that hash is stored safely, not your password itself. That means that every time you log-in, the web application hashes your input and compares the hashed results to the stored hash. If you want to learn more about secure password storage, you can do that on our platform.
Hashing input takes some time on a computer and developers always try to optimize everything they write in order for the users to have a smooth experience. One thing that speeds up the program is to skip the hashing when it is not needed. For example, when the username does not exist (and so no password needs to be checked) they can respond to the user immediately. This way they can skip the slow computation of hashing the password. If the username was correct they will hash the password input and compare that to the stored hash.
At this point, you might have guessed where things can go wrong. Even though in reality the hashing takes only a few milliseconds, a hacker can use this added delay to find out if the username he entered was correct or not since a wrong username will have a slightly faster response because no hashing was done. This type of side-channel attack is called a timing attack and it is a good example for how different non-functional requirements can counteract each other. Sometimes code cannot be fast and secure at the same time.
So even though the passwords are handled perfectly, and the message that is displayed is generic and does not advise whether the password or username was incorrect, the system is still vulnerable. The solution is easy, always hash the password or delay sending the reply the time it would take to hash.
The information obtained can be used by an attacker to gain a list of users on system. This information can be used to attack the web application, for example, through a brute force or default username/password attack.
Click on the link below and download the PDF of this resource.
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
View reportBook a demo
Application Security Researcher - R&D Engineer - PhD Candidate
A side-channel attack is when a hacker can gather information from the physical implementation of a software system rather than a theoretical weakness in the algorithm or bug in the code of the software.
An example I like to use to make this more clear is a way to do username enumeration. If you want to know what username enumeration is or why it is bad, visit our website for a video explanation or play a challenge to see if you can identify it in code.
Now in order to understand how username enumeration can be done through a side-channel attack, you need to have some understanding of how passwords are (or at least should be) handled in modern web applications. A good web application doesn't know your password, it doesn't save or store your password anywhere. So how does it know that what you typed is correct and in fact your password? Well, your password is hashed.
A hashing function is a mathematical operation that is easy to perform one way (although somewhat computationally expensive) but very difficult to reverse and for good hashing algorithms, the output is unique depending on the input. When you register on a website, that hash is stored safely, not your password itself. That means that every time you log-in, the web application hashes your input and compares the hashed results to the stored hash. If you want to learn more about secure password storage, you can do that on our platform.
Hashing input takes some time on a computer and developers always try to optimize everything they write in order for the users to have a smooth experience. One thing that speeds up the program is to skip the hashing when it is not needed. For example, when the username does not exist (and so no password needs to be checked) they can respond to the user immediately. This way they can skip the slow computation of hashing the password. If the username was correct they will hash the password input and compare that to the stored hash.
At this point, you might have guessed where things can go wrong. Even though in reality the hashing takes only a few milliseconds, a hacker can use this added delay to find out if the username he entered was correct or not since a wrong username will have a slightly faster response because no hashing was done. This type of side-channel attack is called a timing attack and it is a good example for how different non-functional requirements can counteract each other. Sometimes code cannot be fast and secure at the same time.
So even though the passwords are handled perfectly, and the message that is displayed is generic and does not advise whether the password or username was incorrect, the system is still vulnerable. The solution is easy, always hash the password or delay sending the reply the time it would take to hash.
The information obtained can be used by an attacker to gain a list of users on system. This information can be used to attack the web application, for example, through a brute force or default username/password attack.
Table of contents
Application Security Researcher - R&D Engineer - PhD Candidate
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
Book a demoDownloadResources to get you started
Secure by Design: Defining Best Practices, Enabling Developers and Benchmarking Preventative Security Outcomes
In this research paper, Secure Code Warrior co-founders, Pieter Danhieux and Dr. Matias Madou, Ph.D., along with expert contributors, Chris Inglis, Former US National Cyber Director (now Strategic Advisor to Paladin Capital Group), and Devin Lynch, Senior Director, Paladin Global Institute, will reveal key findings from over twenty in-depth interviews with enterprise security leaders including CISOs, a VP of Application Security, and software security professionals.
Benchmarking Security Skills: Streamlining Secure-by-Design in the Enterprise
Finding meaningful data on the success of Secure-by-Design initiatives is notoriously difficult. CISOs are often challenged when attempting to prove the return on investment (ROI) and business value of security program activities at both the people and company levels. Not to mention, it’s particularly difficult for enterprises to gain insights into how their organizations are benchmarked against current industry standards. The President’s National Cybersecurity Strategy challenged stakeholders to “embrace security and resilience by design.” The key to making Secure-by-Design initiatives work is not only giving developers the skills to ensure secure code, but also assuring the regulators that those skills are in place. In this presentation, we share a myriad of qualitative and quantitative data, derived from multiple primary sources, including internal data points collected from over 250,000 developers, data-driven customer insights, and public studies. Leveraging this aggregation of data points, we aim to communicate a vision of the current state of Secure-by-Design initiatives across multiple verticals. The report details why this space is currently underutilized, the significant impact a successful upskilling program can have on cybersecurity risk mitigation, and the potential to eliminate categories of vulnerabilities from a codebase.
Resources to get you started
Setting the Standard: SCW Releases Free AI Coding Security Rules on GitHub
AI-assisted development is no longer on the horizon — it’s here, and it’s rapidly reshaping how software is written. Tools like GitHub Copilot, Cline, Roo, Cursor, Aider, and Windsurf are transforming developers into co-pilots of their own, enabling faster iteration and accelerating everything from prototyping to major refactoring projects.
Close the Loop on Vulnerabilities with Secure Code Warrior + HackerOne
Secure Code Warrior is excited to announce our new integration with HackerOne, a leader in offensive security solutions. Together, we're building a powerful, integrated ecosystem. HackerOne pinpoints where vulnerabilities are actually happening in real-world environments, exposing the "what" and "where" of security issues.
Revealed: How the Cyber Industry Defines Secure by Design
In our latest white paper, our Co-Founders, Pieter Danhieux and Dr. Matias Madou, Ph.D., sat down with over twenty enterprise security leaders, including CISOs, AppSec leaders and security professionals, to figure out the key pieces of this puzzle and uncover the reality behind the Secure by Design movement. It’s a shared ambition across the security teams, but no shared playbook.
Is Vibe Coding Going to Turn Your Codebase Into a Frat Party?
Vibe coding is like a college frat party, and AI is the centerpiece of all the festivities, the keg. It’s a lot of fun to let loose, get creative, and see where your imagination can take you, but after a few keg stands, drinking (or, using AI) in moderation is undoubtedly the safer long-term solution.
Developer-driven coding.
Securely.
Contact us today and make software security an intrinsic part of your development process.
