Coders Conquer Security: Share & Learn Series - CRLF Injection
With blogs or articles like this one, readers are aided by punctuation marks. For example, periods tell readers where a sentence ends, while commas either separate articles in lists or insert hard pauses to help separate ideas. With a well-written blog (like this one), the punctuation is almost invisible, just part of the standard background code that we all learned to process many years ago.
But what happens if a hacker gets into this article and inserts weird punctuation marks in the wrong places? Like this:
Without,even! changing. the, text. it? can. make it! much? harder. to? process! the, information!
That is basically what happens with a CRLF injection attack. The CRLF letters stand for Carriage Return and Line Feed, which are used individually or together to note the termination of a line. If an attacker can insert a CR or LF code into an existing application, they can sometimes change its behavior. The effects are less easy to predict compared with most attacks, but can be no less dangerous to the target organization.
In this episode we will learn:
- How attackers can trigger a CRLF injection
- Why CRLF injections are dangerous
- Techniques that can fix this vulnerability.
How do Attackers Trigger a CRLF Injection?
Injecting CRLF characters into existing code and trying to produce a specific result is rather difficult, though not impossible. It's made harder because an attacker would need to use different CRLF combinations depending on the operating system and other factors of the targeted system. For example, modern Windows machines require both a CR and LF to end a line, while over on Linux, only the LF code is needed. HTTP requests always require a precise CRLF code to end a line.
But beyond the fact that CRLF attacks are difficult to implement, and even harder to predict their results, they are initiated in much the same way as other injection type attacks. A malicious user simply enters data into any area on a website or application that allows it, only they enter the CRLF code instead of, or after, normal input data.
For example, an attacker could enter the ASCII code representing a carriage return (%0d) followed by ASCII for a line feed (%0a) at the end of an HTTPS header. The whole query would then look like this:
https://validsite.com/index.php?page=home%0d%0a
If the data is not sanitized or filtered, the above code might allow some strange things to happen on the target application or website.
Why are CRLF Injections Dangerous?
While CRLF injection attacks are less precise than most, they can be fairly dangerous at least some of the time. At the low end, adding an extra line can mess up log files, which might trigger automatic cybersecurity defenses to alert administrators to a non-issue. However, this could be used to divert resources away from an actual incursion occurring at the same time.
But CRLF attacks can also be directly damaging. For example, if an application is designed to accept commands and then search for a specific file, adding a CRLF code to the query might trigger the application to display that process to the screen instead of keeping it hidden, which could provide valuable information for an attacker.
CRLF injections can also be used to create what is called a response splitting attack, where the end of line codes break up a valid response into multiple pieces. That can give hackers control of the header after the CRLF code, which can be used to inject additional code. It can also be used to create an opening where the attacker can fully inject their own code, and likely trigger another form of attack, on any line following the part broken by the CRLF attack.
Eliminating the CRLF Injection Vulnerability
If there is one key message to take away from this series, it's to never, ever trust user input. Most of the vulnerabilities we have covered in this series have involved user input areas in one way or another, and the CRLF injection flaw is no exception.
At any point where a user can enter input, filters must be applied to prevent the injection of unauthorized code that might be misinterpreted by the application or server. For CRLF attacks, locking down HTTP headers is especially important, but you also can't forget GET and POST parameters or even Cookies. One great way to specifically thwart CRLF codes from helping to trigger further injections is to apply HTML encoding to anything and everything sent back to a user's browser.
More Information about CRLF Injections
For further reading, you can take a look at what OWASP says about CRLF injections. You can also put your newfound defensive knowledge to the test with the free demo of the Secure Code Warrior platform, which trains cybersecurity teams to become the ultimate cyber warriors. To learn more about defeating this vulnerability, and a rogues'gallery of other threats, visit the Secure Code Warrior blog.
If an attacker can insert a CR or LF code into an existing application, they can sometimes change its behavior. The effects are less easy to predict compared with most attacks, but can be no less dangerous to the target organization.
Jaap Karan Singh is a Secure Coding Evangelist, Chief Singh and co-founder of Secure Code Warrior.
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
Book a demo
Jaap Karan Singh is a Secure Coding Evangelist, Chief Singh and co-founder of Secure Code Warrior.
With blogs or articles like this one, readers are aided by punctuation marks. For example, periods tell readers where a sentence ends, while commas either separate articles in lists or insert hard pauses to help separate ideas. With a well-written blog (like this one), the punctuation is almost invisible, just part of the standard background code that we all learned to process many years ago.
But what happens if a hacker gets into this article and inserts weird punctuation marks in the wrong places? Like this:
Without,even! changing. the, text. it? can. make it! much? harder. to? process! the, information!
That is basically what happens with a CRLF injection attack. The CRLF letters stand for Carriage Return and Line Feed, which are used individually or together to note the termination of a line. If an attacker can insert a CR or LF code into an existing application, they can sometimes change its behavior. The effects are less easy to predict compared with most attacks, but can be no less dangerous to the target organization.
In this episode we will learn:
- How attackers can trigger a CRLF injection
- Why CRLF injections are dangerous
- Techniques that can fix this vulnerability.
How do Attackers Trigger a CRLF Injection?
Injecting CRLF characters into existing code and trying to produce a specific result is rather difficult, though not impossible. It's made harder because an attacker would need to use different CRLF combinations depending on the operating system and other factors of the targeted system. For example, modern Windows machines require both a CR and LF to end a line, while over on Linux, only the LF code is needed. HTTP requests always require a precise CRLF code to end a line.
But beyond the fact that CRLF attacks are difficult to implement, and even harder to predict their results, they are initiated in much the same way as other injection type attacks. A malicious user simply enters data into any area on a website or application that allows it, only they enter the CRLF code instead of, or after, normal input data.
For example, an attacker could enter the ASCII code representing a carriage return (%0d) followed by ASCII for a line feed (%0a) at the end of an HTTPS header. The whole query would then look like this:
https://validsite.com/index.php?page=home%0d%0a
If the data is not sanitized or filtered, the above code might allow some strange things to happen on the target application or website.
Why are CRLF Injections Dangerous?
While CRLF injection attacks are less precise than most, they can be fairly dangerous at least some of the time. At the low end, adding an extra line can mess up log files, which might trigger automatic cybersecurity defenses to alert administrators to a non-issue. However, this could be used to divert resources away from an actual incursion occurring at the same time.
But CRLF attacks can also be directly damaging. For example, if an application is designed to accept commands and then search for a specific file, adding a CRLF code to the query might trigger the application to display that process to the screen instead of keeping it hidden, which could provide valuable information for an attacker.
CRLF injections can also be used to create what is called a response splitting attack, where the end of line codes break up a valid response into multiple pieces. That can give hackers control of the header after the CRLF code, which can be used to inject additional code. It can also be used to create an opening where the attacker can fully inject their own code, and likely trigger another form of attack, on any line following the part broken by the CRLF attack.
Eliminating the CRLF Injection Vulnerability
If there is one key message to take away from this series, it's to never, ever trust user input. Most of the vulnerabilities we have covered in this series have involved user input areas in one way or another, and the CRLF injection flaw is no exception.
At any point where a user can enter input, filters must be applied to prevent the injection of unauthorized code that might be misinterpreted by the application or server. For CRLF attacks, locking down HTTP headers is especially important, but you also can't forget GET and POST parameters or even Cookies. One great way to specifically thwart CRLF codes from helping to trigger further injections is to apply HTML encoding to anything and everything sent back to a user's browser.
More Information about CRLF Injections
For further reading, you can take a look at what OWASP says about CRLF injections. You can also put your newfound defensive knowledge to the test with the free demo of the Secure Code Warrior platform, which trains cybersecurity teams to become the ultimate cyber warriors. To learn more about defeating this vulnerability, and a rogues'gallery of other threats, visit the Secure Code Warrior blog.
With blogs or articles like this one, readers are aided by punctuation marks. For example, periods tell readers where a sentence ends, while commas either separate articles in lists or insert hard pauses to help separate ideas. With a well-written blog (like this one), the punctuation is almost invisible, just part of the standard background code that we all learned to process many years ago.
But what happens if a hacker gets into this article and inserts weird punctuation marks in the wrong places? Like this:
Without,even! changing. the, text. it? can. make it! much? harder. to? process! the, information!
That is basically what happens with a CRLF injection attack. The CRLF letters stand for Carriage Return and Line Feed, which are used individually or together to note the termination of a line. If an attacker can insert a CR or LF code into an existing application, they can sometimes change its behavior. The effects are less easy to predict compared with most attacks, but can be no less dangerous to the target organization.
In this episode we will learn:
- How attackers can trigger a CRLF injection
- Why CRLF injections are dangerous
- Techniques that can fix this vulnerability.
How do Attackers Trigger a CRLF Injection?
Injecting CRLF characters into existing code and trying to produce a specific result is rather difficult, though not impossible. It's made harder because an attacker would need to use different CRLF combinations depending on the operating system and other factors of the targeted system. For example, modern Windows machines require both a CR and LF to end a line, while over on Linux, only the LF code is needed. HTTP requests always require a precise CRLF code to end a line.
But beyond the fact that CRLF attacks are difficult to implement, and even harder to predict their results, they are initiated in much the same way as other injection type attacks. A malicious user simply enters data into any area on a website or application that allows it, only they enter the CRLF code instead of, or after, normal input data.
For example, an attacker could enter the ASCII code representing a carriage return (%0d) followed by ASCII for a line feed (%0a) at the end of an HTTPS header. The whole query would then look like this:
https://validsite.com/index.php?page=home%0d%0a
If the data is not sanitized or filtered, the above code might allow some strange things to happen on the target application or website.
Why are CRLF Injections Dangerous?
While CRLF injection attacks are less precise than most, they can be fairly dangerous at least some of the time. At the low end, adding an extra line can mess up log files, which might trigger automatic cybersecurity defenses to alert administrators to a non-issue. However, this could be used to divert resources away from an actual incursion occurring at the same time.
But CRLF attacks can also be directly damaging. For example, if an application is designed to accept commands and then search for a specific file, adding a CRLF code to the query might trigger the application to display that process to the screen instead of keeping it hidden, which could provide valuable information for an attacker.
CRLF injections can also be used to create what is called a response splitting attack, where the end of line codes break up a valid response into multiple pieces. That can give hackers control of the header after the CRLF code, which can be used to inject additional code. It can also be used to create an opening where the attacker can fully inject their own code, and likely trigger another form of attack, on any line following the part broken by the CRLF attack.
Eliminating the CRLF Injection Vulnerability
If there is one key message to take away from this series, it's to never, ever trust user input. Most of the vulnerabilities we have covered in this series have involved user input areas in one way or another, and the CRLF injection flaw is no exception.
At any point where a user can enter input, filters must be applied to prevent the injection of unauthorized code that might be misinterpreted by the application or server. For CRLF attacks, locking down HTTP headers is especially important, but you also can't forget GET and POST parameters or even Cookies. One great way to specifically thwart CRLF codes from helping to trigger further injections is to apply HTML encoding to anything and everything sent back to a user's browser.
More Information about CRLF Injections
For further reading, you can take a look at what OWASP says about CRLF injections. You can also put your newfound defensive knowledge to the test with the free demo of the Secure Code Warrior platform, which trains cybersecurity teams to become the ultimate cyber warriors. To learn more about defeating this vulnerability, and a rogues'gallery of other threats, visit the Secure Code Warrior blog.
Click on the link below and download the PDF of this resource.
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
View reportBook a demo
Jaap Karan Singh is a Secure Coding Evangelist, Chief Singh and co-founder of Secure Code Warrior.
With blogs or articles like this one, readers are aided by punctuation marks. For example, periods tell readers where a sentence ends, while commas either separate articles in lists or insert hard pauses to help separate ideas. With a well-written blog (like this one), the punctuation is almost invisible, just part of the standard background code that we all learned to process many years ago.
But what happens if a hacker gets into this article and inserts weird punctuation marks in the wrong places? Like this:
Without,even! changing. the, text. it? can. make it! much? harder. to? process! the, information!
That is basically what happens with a CRLF injection attack. The CRLF letters stand for Carriage Return and Line Feed, which are used individually or together to note the termination of a line. If an attacker can insert a CR or LF code into an existing application, they can sometimes change its behavior. The effects are less easy to predict compared with most attacks, but can be no less dangerous to the target organization.
In this episode we will learn:
- How attackers can trigger a CRLF injection
- Why CRLF injections are dangerous
- Techniques that can fix this vulnerability.
How do Attackers Trigger a CRLF Injection?
Injecting CRLF characters into existing code and trying to produce a specific result is rather difficult, though not impossible. It's made harder because an attacker would need to use different CRLF combinations depending on the operating system and other factors of the targeted system. For example, modern Windows machines require both a CR and LF to end a line, while over on Linux, only the LF code is needed. HTTP requests always require a precise CRLF code to end a line.
But beyond the fact that CRLF attacks are difficult to implement, and even harder to predict their results, they are initiated in much the same way as other injection type attacks. A malicious user simply enters data into any area on a website or application that allows it, only they enter the CRLF code instead of, or after, normal input data.
For example, an attacker could enter the ASCII code representing a carriage return (%0d) followed by ASCII for a line feed (%0a) at the end of an HTTPS header. The whole query would then look like this:
https://validsite.com/index.php?page=home%0d%0a
If the data is not sanitized or filtered, the above code might allow some strange things to happen on the target application or website.
Why are CRLF Injections Dangerous?
While CRLF injection attacks are less precise than most, they can be fairly dangerous at least some of the time. At the low end, adding an extra line can mess up log files, which might trigger automatic cybersecurity defenses to alert administrators to a non-issue. However, this could be used to divert resources away from an actual incursion occurring at the same time.
But CRLF attacks can also be directly damaging. For example, if an application is designed to accept commands and then search for a specific file, adding a CRLF code to the query might trigger the application to display that process to the screen instead of keeping it hidden, which could provide valuable information for an attacker.
CRLF injections can also be used to create what is called a response splitting attack, where the end of line codes break up a valid response into multiple pieces. That can give hackers control of the header after the CRLF code, which can be used to inject additional code. It can also be used to create an opening where the attacker can fully inject their own code, and likely trigger another form of attack, on any line following the part broken by the CRLF attack.
Eliminating the CRLF Injection Vulnerability
If there is one key message to take away from this series, it's to never, ever trust user input. Most of the vulnerabilities we have covered in this series have involved user input areas in one way or another, and the CRLF injection flaw is no exception.
At any point where a user can enter input, filters must be applied to prevent the injection of unauthorized code that might be misinterpreted by the application or server. For CRLF attacks, locking down HTTP headers is especially important, but you also can't forget GET and POST parameters or even Cookies. One great way to specifically thwart CRLF codes from helping to trigger further injections is to apply HTML encoding to anything and everything sent back to a user's browser.
More Information about CRLF Injections
For further reading, you can take a look at what OWASP says about CRLF injections. You can also put your newfound defensive knowledge to the test with the free demo of the Secure Code Warrior platform, which trains cybersecurity teams to become the ultimate cyber warriors. To learn more about defeating this vulnerability, and a rogues'gallery of other threats, visit the Secure Code Warrior blog.
Table of contents
Jaap Karan Singh is a Secure Coding Evangelist, Chief Singh and co-founder of Secure Code Warrior.
Secure Code Warrior is here for your organization to help you secure code across the entire software development lifecycle and create a culture in which cybersecurity is top of mind. Whether you’re an AppSec Manager, Developer, CISO, or anyone involved in security, we can help your organization reduce risks associated with insecure code.
Book a demoDownloadResources to get you started
Secure by Design: Defining Best Practices, Enabling Developers and Benchmarking Preventative Security Outcomes
In this research paper, Secure Code Warrior co-founders, Pieter Danhieux and Dr. Matias Madou, Ph.D., along with expert contributors, Chris Inglis, Former US National Cyber Director (now Strategic Advisor to Paladin Capital Group), and Devin Lynch, Senior Director, Paladin Global Institute, will reveal key findings from over twenty in-depth interviews with enterprise security leaders including CISOs, a VP of Application Security, and software security professionals.
Benchmarking Security Skills: Streamlining Secure-by-Design in the Enterprise
Finding meaningful data on the success of Secure-by-Design initiatives is notoriously difficult. CISOs are often challenged when attempting to prove the return on investment (ROI) and business value of security program activities at both the people and company levels. Not to mention, it’s particularly difficult for enterprises to gain insights into how their organizations are benchmarked against current industry standards. The President’s National Cybersecurity Strategy challenged stakeholders to “embrace security and resilience by design.” The key to making Secure-by-Design initiatives work is not only giving developers the skills to ensure secure code, but also assuring the regulators that those skills are in place. In this presentation, we share a myriad of qualitative and quantitative data, derived from multiple primary sources, including internal data points collected from over 250,000 developers, data-driven customer insights, and public studies. Leveraging this aggregation of data points, we aim to communicate a vision of the current state of Secure-by-Design initiatives across multiple verticals. The report details why this space is currently underutilized, the significant impact a successful upskilling program can have on cybersecurity risk mitigation, and the potential to eliminate categories of vulnerabilities from a codebase.
Secure code training topics & content
Our industry-leading content is always evolving to fit the ever changing software development landscape with your role in mind. Topics covering everything from AI to XQuery Injection, offered for a variety of roles from Architects and Engineers to Product Managers and QA. Get a sneak peak of what our content catalog has to offer by topic and role.
Resources to get you started
Revealed: How the Cyber Industry Defines Secure by Design
In our latest white paper, our Co-Founders, Pieter Danhieux and Dr. Matias Madou, Ph.D., sat down with over twenty enterprise security leaders, including CISOs, AppSec leaders and security professionals, to figure out the key pieces of this puzzle and uncover the reality behind the Secure by Design movement. It’s a shared ambition across the security teams, but no shared playbook.
Is Vibe Coding Going to Turn Your Codebase Into a Frat Party?
Vibe coding is like a college frat party, and AI is the centerpiece of all the festivities, the keg. It’s a lot of fun to let loose, get creative, and see where your imagination can take you, but after a few keg stands, drinking (or, using AI) in moderation is undoubtedly the safer long-term solution.
Developer-driven coding.
Securely.
Contact us today and make software security an intrinsic part of your development process.
