Coders Conquer Security Infrastructure as Code Series: Insecure Cryptography
Coders Conquer Security Infrastructure as Code Series: Insecure Cryptography


Shrewd organizations are embracing the concept of infrastructure as code, and it is developers like you who can make significant contributions in crafting secure code, even outside of building an application. It may seem to a long road to travel at first, but the journey is worth it to stand out among your peers.
Before we get started on this next chapter of our latest Coders Conquer Security series, I'd like to invite you to play a gamified challenge of the sensitive data storage vulnerability; play now and choose from Kubernetes, Terraform, Ansible, Docker, or CloudFormation:
How was that? If your knowledge needs some work, read on:
These days, having critical data like passwords, personal information and financial records hashed while at rest is a cornerstone of any cybersecurity defense. In a lot of ways, it acts as both a last line of defense and also one of the best kinds of protection. That's because even if an attacker is able to break through other defenses and obtain critical files, as long as they are properly hashed and stored, that won't do them very much good.
This also acts as solid secondary protection against malicious insiders because encrypted files can have separate keys or passwords from the rest of the network. In that case, someone like a system administrator or a hacker who has compromised an administrator's credentials might be able to browse into a protected directory, but still not be able to unlock the encrypted files they find there if the encryption key is held elsewhere.
Of course, all encryption protection methods rely on having strong encryption standards that can't be broken by even the most powerful computers.
Why is insecure cryptography dangerous?
When it comes to computer technology, being able to create strong encryption algorithms and the ability to break them have been in competition for a long time. Back in 1977, the federal government in the United States developed the Data Encryption Standard (DES), a 56-bit algorithm which was considered secure at the time given the relative power of computers.
But computers evolved, and people found ways to network them together collaboratively to increase their power even further. In 1999, the Electronic Frontier Foundation along with Distributed.net worked together to publicly break the encryption on a DES-protected document in just 22 hours. Suddenly, any document protected by DES encryption was no longer safe.
Believe it or not, some organizations still protect their critical files with the DES algorithm or with similarly weak encryption protection. And while it took a distributed network to break 56-bit encryption in 1999, today almost any sufficiently powerful standalone computer can do it given a modicum of time. Hackers also have created dedicated cracking machines built from banks of graphics processor units (GPUs). Those GPUs are exceptionally good at that task, are relatively inexpensive to obtain and to network locally.
If you choose to protect your critical files with an insecure or weak cryptographic algorithm today, then it won't take long before most hackers can break down those files and make them readable. If you suffer from a data breach, then you have to assume that the files will eventually be compromised if they were not sufficiently protected.
For example, the following Kubernetes code snippet is using a weak cipher algorithm to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: DES-CBC3-SHA
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, the DES cipher suite has been used to protect the information. However, an attacker could easily decipher it and access sensitive information.
It's recommended to use strong cipher algorithms. In the following Kubernetes example, strong cipher suites have been used to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: |
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:
ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:
ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, a strong suite of ciphers has been used in order to avoid attackers gaining potential access to sensitive information.
Protecting critical information with strong encryption
Strong encryption is available today that is nearly unbreakable. In 2001, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) created a new encryption technology to replace DES. Called the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), it uses three different key lengths, either 128, 192, or 256 bits. The 256 bit AES encryption is the most secure, though all three are considered almost completely unbreakable given today's technology. Tests with supercomputers have found that it would take thousands of years of constant work to break most AES protected documents.
To properly protect critical files, developers should first identify them. There is no need to encrypt everything on a network, as that might slow operations with the constant encrypting and decrypting process. But critical files like personnel records, customer data, and financial information need adequate protection. Essentially, it's a balancing act between security and having a workable system.
And that data should be encrypted to one of the AES standards, even going as far as 256-bit encryption for truly critical information that shouldn't ever land in the wrong hands.
One other thing to consider is the fact that adding encryption is like adding more passwords to a site. That means that authorized users will need to keep track of the encryption keys. To prevent this from becoming a workflow bottleneck, consider implementing a key management platform to keep track of those keys and to keep them safe. And even if you don't end up using centralized key management, be sure that all keys and passwords are protected to ensure that unauthorized users are kept out of your most secure data vaults.
Check out the Secure Code Warrior blog pages for more insight about this vulnerability and how to protect your organization and your customers from the ravages of other security flaws. You can also try a demo of an IaC challenge within the Secure Code Warrior training platform to keep all your cybersecurity skills honed and up-to-date.
Dive into onto our latest secure coding insights on the blog.
Our extensive resource library aims to empower the human approach to secure coding upskilling.
Get the latest research on developer-driven security
Our extensive resource library is full of helpful resources from whitepapers to webinars to get you started with developer-driven secure coding. Explore it now.
Coders Conquer Security Infrastructure as Code Series: Insecure Cryptography

Shrewd organizations are embracing the concept of infrastructure as code, and it is developers like you who can make significant contributions in crafting secure code, even outside of building an application. It may seem to a long road to travel at first, but the journey is worth it to stand out among your peers.
Before we get started on this next chapter of our latest Coders Conquer Security series, I'd like to invite you to play a gamified challenge of the sensitive data storage vulnerability; play now and choose from Kubernetes, Terraform, Ansible, Docker, or CloudFormation:
How was that? If your knowledge needs some work, read on:
These days, having critical data like passwords, personal information and financial records hashed while at rest is a cornerstone of any cybersecurity defense. In a lot of ways, it acts as both a last line of defense and also one of the best kinds of protection. That's because even if an attacker is able to break through other defenses and obtain critical files, as long as they are properly hashed and stored, that won't do them very much good.
This also acts as solid secondary protection against malicious insiders because encrypted files can have separate keys or passwords from the rest of the network. In that case, someone like a system administrator or a hacker who has compromised an administrator's credentials might be able to browse into a protected directory, but still not be able to unlock the encrypted files they find there if the encryption key is held elsewhere.
Of course, all encryption protection methods rely on having strong encryption standards that can't be broken by even the most powerful computers.
Why is insecure cryptography dangerous?
When it comes to computer technology, being able to create strong encryption algorithms and the ability to break them have been in competition for a long time. Back in 1977, the federal government in the United States developed the Data Encryption Standard (DES), a 56-bit algorithm which was considered secure at the time given the relative power of computers.
But computers evolved, and people found ways to network them together collaboratively to increase their power even further. In 1999, the Electronic Frontier Foundation along with Distributed.net worked together to publicly break the encryption on a DES-protected document in just 22 hours. Suddenly, any document protected by DES encryption was no longer safe.
Believe it or not, some organizations still protect their critical files with the DES algorithm or with similarly weak encryption protection. And while it took a distributed network to break 56-bit encryption in 1999, today almost any sufficiently powerful standalone computer can do it given a modicum of time. Hackers also have created dedicated cracking machines built from banks of graphics processor units (GPUs). Those GPUs are exceptionally good at that task, are relatively inexpensive to obtain and to network locally.
If you choose to protect your critical files with an insecure or weak cryptographic algorithm today, then it won't take long before most hackers can break down those files and make them readable. If you suffer from a data breach, then you have to assume that the files will eventually be compromised if they were not sufficiently protected.
For example, the following Kubernetes code snippet is using a weak cipher algorithm to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: DES-CBC3-SHA
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, the DES cipher suite has been used to protect the information. However, an attacker could easily decipher it and access sensitive information.
It's recommended to use strong cipher algorithms. In the following Kubernetes example, strong cipher suites have been used to protect the information at NGINX ingress controller level:
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
name: nginx-load-balancer-conf
namespace: kube-system
data:
ssl-ciphers: |
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:
ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:
ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256:
ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256
ssl-protocols: "TLSv1.2"
In that example, a strong suite of ciphers has been used in order to avoid attackers gaining potential access to sensitive information.
Protecting critical information with strong encryption
Strong encryption is available today that is nearly unbreakable. In 2001, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) created a new encryption technology to replace DES. Called the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), it uses three different key lengths, either 128, 192, or 256 bits. The 256 bit AES encryption is the most secure, though all three are considered almost completely unbreakable given today's technology. Tests with supercomputers have found that it would take thousands of years of constant work to break most AES protected documents.
To properly protect critical files, developers should first identify them. There is no need to encrypt everything on a network, as that might slow operations with the constant encrypting and decrypting process. But critical files like personnel records, customer data, and financial information need adequate protection. Essentially, it's a balancing act between security and having a workable system.
And that data should be encrypted to one of the AES standards, even going as far as 256-bit encryption for truly critical information that shouldn't ever land in the wrong hands.
One other thing to consider is the fact that adding encryption is like adding more passwords to a site. That means that authorized users will need to keep track of the encryption keys. To prevent this from becoming a workflow bottleneck, consider implementing a key management platform to keep track of those keys and to keep them safe. And even if you don't end up using centralized key management, be sure that all keys and passwords are protected to ensure that unauthorized users are kept out of your most secure data vaults.
Check out the Secure Code Warrior blog pages for more insight about this vulnerability and how to protect your organization and your customers from the ravages of other security flaws. You can also try a demo of an IaC challenge within the Secure Code Warrior training platform to keep all your cybersecurity skills honed and up-to-date.