블로그

Sensei Feature Highlight: Library Scope

June 9, 2021
닉 반 하버

Manage dependencies flexibly

The Scope functionality of Sensei has always been a favorite of developers. With the ability to expand or limit the scope of a recipe’s application, development teams have been able to customize its usage to individual projects and verticals within their organizations - empowering developers to personalize their experience.

And understandably, it is at the center of Sensei’s continuous innovation processes. During an innovation brainstorming session on expanding the scope of “scope” (yes, pun intended), a question came up: 

"I was trying to create a recipe for ... but since version x, the framework has deprecated the feature. I am not sure whether it will be useful to create a recipe anymore. What do you think?"

Of course, this is not the first time we have hesitated to create a recipe. While the recipe might be seen as providing redundant information, we believe it is valuable to create something that is applicable to a limited number of versions of the involved dependency. And therefore, we created the Library scope.

Library scope enables us to check whether a dependency is present in the project and conditionally apply Sensei recipes. This gives great flexibility as teams navigate through legacy code and dependencies.

Many of you might know of the Library scope that is already available under General Settings. So what is this you ask? We have enabled Library Scope to be present in YAML, just like the search. This creates a better user experience and does not break your flow as you create the recipe, which otherwise would have you navigate to General Settings and back to update metadata. More of these scopes will come into YAML but we have started with the Library Scope.

So let us dive a little further into how it works with an example.

Library scope applied to hibernate-jpamodelgen

Imagine the following case: 

We want to create a Spring Web REST API that allows us to query some data. According to the best practices, we create a model for the entity we want to query. Next, we add a dependency to Hibernate ORM, so that we do not need to fiddle with the database structure. The ORM takes care of that for us. We also need to create a service that provides the data from the data access layer (CRUD repositories and so on) to the controller. Finally, we create the controller class for our API, where we will expose the allowed queries as endpoints.

To prevent having to expose different endpoints for each field that can be queried, we instead opt to use JPA 2 Specifications. To do so, we create a specification in the controller from the request URL. This specification describes what the entities we are looking for should look like. In the `Specification` class itself, we implement the `toPredicate` method to indicate how the specification can be validated.

But we are faced with an issue in the `toPredicate` method. To construct the predicate, we need to know the names of the columns in the database to compare. But because we are using an ORM, we do not have these columns present in a separate model. So, Hibernate's JPA 2 Metamodel Generator() comes to the rescue! This will help generate a metamodel for the entities we requested it to handle. These metamodels allow us to reference the column names as properties instead of hardcoding them.

Creating the Sensei recipe

Now that we have the metamodels generated, we want to put them to good use. Sensei can help anyone who works on the project by reminding them to use the metamodel, making sure that column names are not hardcoded anywhere. So let’s put that into practice.

To start, we take a look at the `toPredicate` method:‍

To Predicate method

This basic predicate will only compare the name of our entity. We can expand on it using `and` clauses, but for the purpose of this recipe, this 'simple' check will do.

For the search component of the recipe, we want to call the method `get()` of the root parameter, so we select the `methodcall` option from the dropdown. Next, we want to limit the search to a methodcall with the name `get` whose signature is declared in the `Path` interface of the `javax.persistence.criteria` package. As the method has been overloaded, we also need to tell the search that our recipe only applies to the variant that takes a single string as an argument. To fix the issue of having the column names in the code we would want to use an argument of type `SingularAttribute` instead, the same type provided by the metamodel generator.

Setting up the search criteria for the recipe

The recipe that we have created so far will trigger on any codebase that uses the JPA 2 `Path` interface, regardless of whether the codebase is set up to use the Hibernate Model Generator. If this library is present in the project, we want to indicate to the user that it should be used, so we add a library scope to the recipe.

Limiting the scope of search for this recipe

And finally, our recipe is now ready.

Test Recipe Methodcall

With this recipe, any occurrence of `Path#get` that uses a string value as an argument will be flagged. As you can tell from the highlighted example code in the above screenshot, this recipe still works when the literal name of the column name is stored in an intermediate variable.

Note - We can also invert the library scope to handle the case where the library is not available, by prepending a `not` clause to the scope.

Conclusion

As we have seen in the example above, this new feature enables us to create more useful recipes by applying them based on the presence of dependencies in the project. To enhance its power even further, we included more options than were shown in the example, such as not only checking whether the dependency is present, but also applying conditions to the specific version of the dependency. 

The main use cases we see for this feature are preventing recipes from providing duplicate information, detecting issues related to specific versions of dependencies, but also performing migrations from one dependency version to the next. We're looking forward to hearing from you about what uses you see for this feature.

As for all Sensei features, more information on the library scope is available in the reference documentation.

태그라인

배포 전 AI 기반 개발 거버넌스 확보

AI 기반 위험을 측정하고, 커밋 시점에 보안 코딩 정책을 적용하며, SDLC 전반에 걸쳐 안전한 소프트웨어 제공 속도를 높이세요.

데모 예약하기
리소스 라이브러리

더 많은 블로그 살펴보기

보안 코딩, AI 거버넌스, 소프트웨어 리스크 관리에 관한 전문가 콘텐츠를 확인해 보세요.

전체 보기
사례 연구
필터 라벨
div 블록 내부의 텍스트입니다.

Supercharged Security Awareness: How Tournaments are Inspiring Developers at Erste Group

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

더 알아보기
사례 연구
필터 라벨
div 블록 내부의 텍스트입니다.

Security as culture: How Blue Prism cultivates world-class secure developers

Learn how Blue Prism, the global leader in intelligent automation for the enterprise, used Secure Code Warrior's agile learning platform to create a security-first culture with their developers, achieve their business goals, and ship secure code at speed

더 알아보기
사례 연구
필터 라벨
div 블록 내부의 텍스트입니다.

하나의 보안 문화: Sage는 어떻게 챔피언 프로그램을 구축했는가

Sage가 유연하고 관계 중심적인 접근 방식을 통해 보안을 강화하고, 200명 이상의 보안 챔피언을 양성하며 실질적인 위험 감소를 달성한 사례를 확인해 보세요.

더 알아보기
블로그
필터 라벨
div 블록 내부의 텍스트입니다.

2026년 사이버 보안 인식의 달: 기업 방어의 핵심, AI 보안 이해하기

주요 AI 기업 대부분이 안전 가이드라인이 마련될 때까지 AI 개발 속도를 전 세계적으로 늦춰야 한다고 공개적으로 촉구하는 시점에 이르렀지만, 사실 심각한 보안 문제는 이미 현실화되었습니다. 이로 인해 AI 도입에 따른 금전적 비용과 위험 부담이 계속 쌓이면서 수많은 보안 책임자와 경영진이 절박한 상황에 놓였습니다.

더 알아보기
블로그
필터 라벨
div 블록 내부의 텍스트입니다.

인에이블러 8: 프로그램 브랜딩

성공적인 보안 코딩 프로그램을 위해서는 훌륭한 콘텐츠 그 이상의 것이 필요합니다. 인에이블러 8에서는 브랜딩을 통해 참여를 누구나 선망하는 위상 중심의 경험으로 바꾸는 방법을 알아봅니다.

더 알아보기
블로그
필터 라벨
div 블록 내부의 텍스트입니다.

이제 모든 직원이 AI 사이버 보안의 최전선에 있습니다

엔터프라이즈 기술 환경은 너무 늦기 전까지는 아무도 예상하지 못한 속도로 변화하고 있습니다. 우리는 공식적으로 사람이 직접 작성한 코드와 기본적인 코파일럿 지원의 시대를 지나 '에이전트 기반 개발 수명 주기(ADLC)'의 시대로 진입했습니다. 자율형 AI 에이전트는 여러 기능 전반에 걸쳐 전례 없는 효율성을 약속하지만, 동시에 완전히 새로운 차원의 보안 및 규제 위험을 야기합니다.

더 알아보기

배포 전 AI 기반 개발 보안 확보

소프트웨어 개발 수명 주기 전반에서 개발자 리스크를 파악하고, 정책을 시행하며, 취약점을 예방하세요.

데모 예약하기
항목이 없습니다.