
最近の Apache の問題の原因となったパストラバーサルの脆弱性の影響を体験してください
At the beginning of October, Apache released version 2.4.49 to fix a Path Traversal and Remote Code Execution vulnerability and then subsequently 2.4.50 to address the fact that the fix in 2.4.49 was incomplete. Perhaps you’ve seen talk on social media about the importance of updating to the latest version to avoid these risks, given that Apache powers 25% of the internet by some estimates. But what’s the deal? How much risk exists here?
Why not try it out yourself?
We’ve built a mission to demonstrate the risks in a real-life environment and have made it public for everyone to try. In this Mission, we’ll walk you through how the Path Traversal Vulnerability can impact your infrastructure and applications. Click below to jump right in, or continue reading to learn more about the vulnerability in detail.

About the Path Traversal Vulnerability
The vulnerability was introduced in the 2.4.49 release (due to a change to the URL normalization function), where a new path normalization function was introduced. Unfortunately, it failed to correctly normalize URL encoded paths. This makes it possible to conduct a path traversal attack if the following configuration is not present:
.avif)
And if mod_cgi is enabled, it can also be leveraged into a Remote Code Execution vulnerability. But let’s first dig into URL encoding to better understand what went wrong.
URL Encoding
At its most basic, the vulnerability occurs due to a lack of consideration for URLs with URL encoding. The newly introduced path normalization function did not fully handle cases where dots were URL encoded.
Remember that to conduct a path traversal attack, you will need to traverse with the sequence ../. The normalization function, however, is smart enough to strip that out. So what do you do? You can URL encode a .(Dot) down to %2e, and use a sequence like .%2e/. That would work in many cases against Apache 2.4.40. But you can also go one step further and double encode it. The URL encoded version of .%2e/ is .%252e/. This was further able to bypass the attempted normalization by Apache.
But there's a catch
If someone wanted to try to exploit this vulnerability straight in their browser, they would not be successful. This is due to the fact that browsers also try to normalize URLs that are sent to servers. This means that even our double-encoded sequence will be removed. It also means that we can't simply use a browser to demonstrate this.
You can use cURL to demonstrate this by using the --path-as-is flag, which prevents it from normalizing the URL before sending it:
.avif)
Prevention and mitigation
To fully prevent the issue, it's important to keep up to date with the latest patches from Apache. Specifically, you will want to upgrade to 2.4.51 at a minimum. But it's a good practice to upgrade on a regular schedule to stay up to date.
To mitigate against this issue if you are running 2.4.49, ensure that you have included the following in your Apache configuration:
.avif)
And to prevent Remote Code Execution, disable mod_cgi if you do not utilize it.
Experience the impact for yourself
Interested in exploring exactly what happened and trying it out for yourself?


10月の初めに、Apacheはパストラバーサルとリモートコード実行の脆弱性を修正するバージョン2.4.49をリリースし、修正が不完全だったという事実に対処するバージョン2.4.50をリリースしました。私たちは、現実の環境におけるリスクを実証するという使命を掲げました。今すぐ試してみてください。

Secure Code Warriorは、ソフトウェア開発ライフサイクル全体にわたってコードを保護し、サイバーセキュリティを最優先とする文化を築くお手伝いをします。アプリケーションセキュリティマネージャ、開発者、CISO、またはセキュリティ関係者のいずれであっても、安全でないコードに関連するリスクを軽減するお手伝いをします。
デモを予約

At the beginning of October, Apache released version 2.4.49 to fix a Path Traversal and Remote Code Execution vulnerability and then subsequently 2.4.50 to address the fact that the fix in 2.4.49 was incomplete. Perhaps you’ve seen talk on social media about the importance of updating to the latest version to avoid these risks, given that Apache powers 25% of the internet by some estimates. But what’s the deal? How much risk exists here?
Why not try it out yourself?
We’ve built a mission to demonstrate the risks in a real-life environment and have made it public for everyone to try. In this Mission, we’ll walk you through how the Path Traversal Vulnerability can impact your infrastructure and applications. Click below to jump right in, or continue reading to learn more about the vulnerability in detail.

About the Path Traversal Vulnerability
The vulnerability was introduced in the 2.4.49 release (due to a change to the URL normalization function), where a new path normalization function was introduced. Unfortunately, it failed to correctly normalize URL encoded paths. This makes it possible to conduct a path traversal attack if the following configuration is not present:
.avif)
And if mod_cgi is enabled, it can also be leveraged into a Remote Code Execution vulnerability. But let’s first dig into URL encoding to better understand what went wrong.
URL Encoding
At its most basic, the vulnerability occurs due to a lack of consideration for URLs with URL encoding. The newly introduced path normalization function did not fully handle cases where dots were URL encoded.
Remember that to conduct a path traversal attack, you will need to traverse with the sequence ../. The normalization function, however, is smart enough to strip that out. So what do you do? You can URL encode a .(Dot) down to %2e, and use a sequence like .%2e/. That would work in many cases against Apache 2.4.40. But you can also go one step further and double encode it. The URL encoded version of .%2e/ is .%252e/. This was further able to bypass the attempted normalization by Apache.
But there's a catch
If someone wanted to try to exploit this vulnerability straight in their browser, they would not be successful. This is due to the fact that browsers also try to normalize URLs that are sent to servers. This means that even our double-encoded sequence will be removed. It also means that we can't simply use a browser to demonstrate this.
You can use cURL to demonstrate this by using the --path-as-is flag, which prevents it from normalizing the URL before sending it:
.avif)
Prevention and mitigation
To fully prevent the issue, it's important to keep up to date with the latest patches from Apache. Specifically, you will want to upgrade to 2.4.51 at a minimum. But it's a good practice to upgrade on a regular schedule to stay up to date.
To mitigate against this issue if you are running 2.4.49, ensure that you have included the following in your Apache configuration:
.avif)
And to prevent Remote Code Execution, disable mod_cgi if you do not utilize it.
Experience the impact for yourself
Interested in exploring exactly what happened and trying it out for yourself?

At the beginning of October, Apache released version 2.4.49 to fix a Path Traversal and Remote Code Execution vulnerability and then subsequently 2.4.50 to address the fact that the fix in 2.4.49 was incomplete. Perhaps you’ve seen talk on social media about the importance of updating to the latest version to avoid these risks, given that Apache powers 25% of the internet by some estimates. But what’s the deal? How much risk exists here?
Why not try it out yourself?
We’ve built a mission to demonstrate the risks in a real-life environment and have made it public for everyone to try. In this Mission, we’ll walk you through how the Path Traversal Vulnerability can impact your infrastructure and applications. Click below to jump right in, or continue reading to learn more about the vulnerability in detail.

About the Path Traversal Vulnerability
The vulnerability was introduced in the 2.4.49 release (due to a change to the URL normalization function), where a new path normalization function was introduced. Unfortunately, it failed to correctly normalize URL encoded paths. This makes it possible to conduct a path traversal attack if the following configuration is not present:
.avif)
And if mod_cgi is enabled, it can also be leveraged into a Remote Code Execution vulnerability. But let’s first dig into URL encoding to better understand what went wrong.
URL Encoding
At its most basic, the vulnerability occurs due to a lack of consideration for URLs with URL encoding. The newly introduced path normalization function did not fully handle cases where dots were URL encoded.
Remember that to conduct a path traversal attack, you will need to traverse with the sequence ../. The normalization function, however, is smart enough to strip that out. So what do you do? You can URL encode a .(Dot) down to %2e, and use a sequence like .%2e/. That would work in many cases against Apache 2.4.40. But you can also go one step further and double encode it. The URL encoded version of .%2e/ is .%252e/. This was further able to bypass the attempted normalization by Apache.
But there's a catch
If someone wanted to try to exploit this vulnerability straight in their browser, they would not be successful. This is due to the fact that browsers also try to normalize URLs that are sent to servers. This means that even our double-encoded sequence will be removed. It also means that we can't simply use a browser to demonstrate this.
You can use cURL to demonstrate this by using the --path-as-is flag, which prevents it from normalizing the URL before sending it:
.avif)
Prevention and mitigation
To fully prevent the issue, it's important to keep up to date with the latest patches from Apache. Specifically, you will want to upgrade to 2.4.51 at a minimum. But it's a good practice to upgrade on a regular schedule to stay up to date.
To mitigate against this issue if you are running 2.4.49, ensure that you have included the following in your Apache configuration:
.avif)
And to prevent Remote Code Execution, disable mod_cgi if you do not utilize it.
Experience the impact for yourself
Interested in exploring exactly what happened and trying it out for yourself?
At the beginning of October, Apache released version 2.4.49 to fix a Path Traversal and Remote Code Execution vulnerability and then subsequently 2.4.50 to address the fact that the fix in 2.4.49 was incomplete. Perhaps you’ve seen talk on social media about the importance of updating to the latest version to avoid these risks, given that Apache powers 25% of the internet by some estimates. But what’s the deal? How much risk exists here?
Why not try it out yourself?
We’ve built a mission to demonstrate the risks in a real-life environment and have made it public for everyone to try. In this Mission, we’ll walk you through how the Path Traversal Vulnerability can impact your infrastructure and applications. Click below to jump right in, or continue reading to learn more about the vulnerability in detail.

About the Path Traversal Vulnerability
The vulnerability was introduced in the 2.4.49 release (due to a change to the URL normalization function), where a new path normalization function was introduced. Unfortunately, it failed to correctly normalize URL encoded paths. This makes it possible to conduct a path traversal attack if the following configuration is not present:
.avif)
And if mod_cgi is enabled, it can also be leveraged into a Remote Code Execution vulnerability. But let’s first dig into URL encoding to better understand what went wrong.
URL Encoding
At its most basic, the vulnerability occurs due to a lack of consideration for URLs with URL encoding. The newly introduced path normalization function did not fully handle cases where dots were URL encoded.
Remember that to conduct a path traversal attack, you will need to traverse with the sequence ../. The normalization function, however, is smart enough to strip that out. So what do you do? You can URL encode a .(Dot) down to %2e, and use a sequence like .%2e/. That would work in many cases against Apache 2.4.40. But you can also go one step further and double encode it. The URL encoded version of .%2e/ is .%252e/. This was further able to bypass the attempted normalization by Apache.
But there's a catch
If someone wanted to try to exploit this vulnerability straight in their browser, they would not be successful. This is due to the fact that browsers also try to normalize URLs that are sent to servers. This means that even our double-encoded sequence will be removed. It also means that we can't simply use a browser to demonstrate this.
You can use cURL to demonstrate this by using the --path-as-is flag, which prevents it from normalizing the URL before sending it:
.avif)
Prevention and mitigation
To fully prevent the issue, it's important to keep up to date with the latest patches from Apache. Specifically, you will want to upgrade to 2.4.51 at a minimum. But it's a good practice to upgrade on a regular schedule to stay up to date.
To mitigate against this issue if you are running 2.4.49, ensure that you have included the following in your Apache configuration:
.avif)
And to prevent Remote Code Execution, disable mod_cgi if you do not utilize it.
Experience the impact for yourself
Interested in exploring exactly what happened and trying it out for yourself?
始めるためのリソース
Threat Modeling with AI: Turning Every Developer into a Threat Modeler
Walk away better equipped to help developers combine threat modeling ideas and techniques with the AI tools they're already using to strengthen security, improve collaboration, and build more resilient software from the start.




%20(1).avif)
.avif)
