Insights from experts shaping secure development

À l'heure actuelle, seuls 15 % des développeurs pensent que les pratiques de code sécurisées devraient être la responsabilité de chacun. Dans un monde où les menaces à la sécurité augmentent, cela ne suffit tout simplement pas. Il faut faire quelque chose. Pour créer une culture AppSec saine, il est essentiel de comprendre les principales influences (et influenceurs !) en train de jouer.

Nous devons renforcer l'approche humaine des meilleures pratiques en matière de cybersécurité, et elle donnera de meilleurs résultats qu'une dépendance excessive à l'automatisation, aux outils et à la réaction à des problèmes déjà intégrés et découverts.

Le code non sécurisé coûte des millions aux entreprises. Alors, qu'est-ce qui les empêche d'adopter des pratiques de codage sécurisées ? Dans un monde qui repose sur les logiciels pour à peu près tout, il est essentiel de garantir la sécurité du code. La réputation de la marque et sa viabilité financière en dépendent. Cela dit, le codage sécurisé suscite de nombreuses préoccupations et de nombreux obstacles entravent son adoption complète et efficace. Plus que jamais, une nouvelle façon de travailler s'impose.

Kamer van Koophandel shares how it embedded secure coding into everyday development through role-based certifications, Trust Score benchmarking, and a culture of shared security ownership.

See how Paysafe's partnership with Secure Code Warrior led to a 45% boost in developer productivity and a major reduction in code vulnerabilities.

DigitalOcean's use of Secure Code Warrior training has significantly reduced security debt, allowing teams to focus more on innovation and productivity. The improved security has strengthened their product quality and competitive edge. Looking ahead, the SCW Trust Score will help them further enhance security practices and continue driving innovation.

The OWASP Foundation has been a guiding light for security professionals and enthusiasts alike, providing critical, practical advice on the most insidious software vulnerabilities across a plethora of categories and platforms. It has been the first major update since 2021 to the flagship OWASP Top 10 Web Vulnerabilities, and in that time, the industry has been rocked by a stampede of AI technology, tools, and code, each creating a dichotomy of security efficiency and risk for both cybersecurity and software engineering professionals.

The bottom line: AI tools are not safe for enterprise use unless the code output is reviewed and implemented by a security-proficient human. 30% of security experts admit that they don't trust(link is external) the accuracy of code generated by AI itself. That's why security leaders must prioritize the education and upskilling of developer teams, to ensure they have the necessary skills and capabilities to mitigate AI-assisted code vulnerabilities as early as possible. This will lead to the cultivation of a "security first" team culture and safer AI use.

Here's the lowdown on all the tech from 2025 that you, dear Zoomer, should know about.

AI risk doesn't stop at engineering. Get the one-pager on Citizen AI — build AI literacy and safe habits across your whole workforce.

From AI autocomplete to autonomous agents—explore how software development is evolving and what it means for security, governance, and your team.

Gartner named SCW twice in the 2026 Hype Cycle for Secure Software Engineering. Here's why it matters for AI-driven development.