Shifting the focus from reactive to proactive, with human-led secure coding

Published Mar 23, 2021
by Secure Code Warrior
cASE sTUDY

Shifting the focus from reactive to proactive, with human-led secure coding

Published Mar 23, 2021
by Secure Code Warrior
View Resource
View Resource

The same 10 software vulnerabilities have caused more security breaches in the last 20+ years than any others. And yet, many businesses still opt for post-breach, post-event remediation; muddling through the human and business ramifications of it all. But now a new research study points to a new, human-led direction. 

The following discusses insights derived from a study conducted by Secure Code Warrior with Evans Data Corp titled ‘Shifting from reaction to prevention: The changing face of application security’ (2021) exploring developers attitudes towards secure coding, secure code practices, and security operations. Download the whitepaper here.

In the soon-to-be-released study, developers and development  managers were asked about the activities they associate with secure coding. The top three responses were:

  • Using scanning tools on deployed applications.
  • Manually reviewing code for vulnerabilities.
  • The active and ongoing practice of writing software that is protected from vulnerabilities. 
Developers still view secure code practices as a reactive practice practice, but slowly acknowledge it  as a Human issue with a focus on starting left.


So what is this telling us? Two of the top three responses are still focused on reactive approaches, the first dependent on tooling (scanners), and second on the developer (i.e. human) performing manual checks – in both cases after the code is written. Vulnerabilities detected using these methods have to be kicked back to the development team for rework with knock-on effects on project timelines and project costs. 

At the same time, two of the three activities nominated rely on the human element – a pointer to growing perceptions of security as a human issue. But of all the activities nominated, the most telling is No. 3, which identifies the human factor in writing software that is protected from vulnerabilities in the first place.  This highlights a shift to starting left – a proactive and preventive approach that bakes security into software right from the start of the software development lifecycle. 

Reactive can equal EXPENSIVE

According to an IBM study*, it is thirty times more expensive to fix vulnerabilities in post-release code than if they were found and remediated at the beginning. That’s a powerful incentive for a new proactive and a more human approach to defense of software security that equips developers to code more securely, right from the start. 

This is what you could call a human-led defense. But to get developers to start caring about security, it has to become part of the way they think and code every day. This is a  call for new approaches to training that are hyper-relevant to developers’ everyday work and inspire them to want to learn – neither of which can be said of current training models.

To create a proactive security culture, new training is needed that:

  • makes secure coding a positive and engaging experience for developers as they increase their software security skills 
  • encourages developers to view their daily coding tasks through a security mindset 
  • makes secure coding intrinsic to their daily workflow

When these threads come together, vulnerabilities are prevented from occurring in the first place, allowing teams to ship quality code faster, with confidence. The good news is that a Learning Platform already exists that 'starts left' in the software development process – one that is already empowering developers with the skills and tools to create quality code from the very start.



*IBM Software Group; Minimizing Code Defects to Improve Software Quality and Lower Development Costs
https://docplayer.net/11413245-Minimizing-code-defects-to-improve-software-quality-and-lower-development-costs.html



View Resource
View Resource

Author

Secure Code Warrior

Secure Code Warrior builds a culture of security-driven developers by giving them the skills  to code securely. Our flagship Agile Learning Platform delivers relevant skills-based pathways,  hands-on missions, and contextual tools for developers to rapidly learn, build, and apply  their skills to write secure code at speed.

Want more?

Dive into onto our latest secure coding insights on the blog.

Our extensive resource library aims to empower the human approach to secure coding upskilling.

View Blog
Want more?

Get the latest research on developer-driven security

Our extensive resource library is full of helpful resources from whitepapers to webinars to get you started with developer-driven secure coding. Explore it now.

Resource Hub

Shifting the focus from reactive to proactive, with human-led secure coding

Published Mar 23, 2021
By Secure Code Warrior

The same 10 software vulnerabilities have caused more security breaches in the last 20+ years than any others. And yet, many businesses still opt for post-breach, post-event remediation; muddling through the human and business ramifications of it all. But now a new research study points to a new, human-led direction. 

The following discusses insights derived from a study conducted by Secure Code Warrior with Evans Data Corp titled ‘Shifting from reaction to prevention: The changing face of application security’ (2021) exploring developers attitudes towards secure coding, secure code practices, and security operations. Download the whitepaper here.

In the soon-to-be-released study, developers and development  managers were asked about the activities they associate with secure coding. The top three responses were:

  • Using scanning tools on deployed applications.
  • Manually reviewing code for vulnerabilities.
  • The active and ongoing practice of writing software that is protected from vulnerabilities. 
Developers still view secure code practices as a reactive practice practice, but slowly acknowledge it  as a Human issue with a focus on starting left.


So what is this telling us? Two of the top three responses are still focused on reactive approaches, the first dependent on tooling (scanners), and second on the developer (i.e. human) performing manual checks – in both cases after the code is written. Vulnerabilities detected using these methods have to be kicked back to the development team for rework with knock-on effects on project timelines and project costs. 

At the same time, two of the three activities nominated rely on the human element – a pointer to growing perceptions of security as a human issue. But of all the activities nominated, the most telling is No. 3, which identifies the human factor in writing software that is protected from vulnerabilities in the first place.  This highlights a shift to starting left – a proactive and preventive approach that bakes security into software right from the start of the software development lifecycle. 

Reactive can equal EXPENSIVE

According to an IBM study*, it is thirty times more expensive to fix vulnerabilities in post-release code than if they were found and remediated at the beginning. That’s a powerful incentive for a new proactive and a more human approach to defense of software security that equips developers to code more securely, right from the start. 

This is what you could call a human-led defense. But to get developers to start caring about security, it has to become part of the way they think and code every day. This is a  call for new approaches to training that are hyper-relevant to developers’ everyday work and inspire them to want to learn – neither of which can be said of current training models.

To create a proactive security culture, new training is needed that:

  • makes secure coding a positive and engaging experience for developers as they increase their software security skills 
  • encourages developers to view their daily coding tasks through a security mindset 
  • makes secure coding intrinsic to their daily workflow

When these threads come together, vulnerabilities are prevented from occurring in the first place, allowing teams to ship quality code faster, with confidence. The good news is that a Learning Platform already exists that 'starts left' in the software development process – one that is already empowering developers with the skills and tools to create quality code from the very start.



*IBM Software Group; Minimizing Code Defects to Improve Software Quality and Lower Development Costs
https://docplayer.net/11413245-Minimizing-code-defects-to-improve-software-quality-and-lower-development-costs.html



We would like your permission to send you information on our products and/or related secure coding topics. We’ll always treat your personal details with the utmost care and will never sell them to other companies for marketing purposes.

To submit the form, please enable 'Analytics' cookies. Feel free to disable them again once you're done.