Insights from experts shaping secure development

A medida que las brechas de datos y sus costos siguen aumentando, el volumen de código producido en nuestro mundo es demasiado grande para que los expertos en seguridad lo manejen solos. Las empresas necesitan desarrolladores con habilidades de codificación segura, y los desarrolladores saben que necesitan estas habilidades para avanzar en sus carreras. Sin embargo, la formación actual en código seguro las está decepcionando. Entonces, ¿qué quieren los desarrolladores en lo que respecta a la formación sobre código seguro?

¡Aburrido, aburrido, aburrido! Esa es una de las principales respuestas que escucharán de los desarrolladores cada vez que se mencione la formación en código seguro. En Secure Code Warrior creemos que debe haber una forma mejor.

Hay algunas razones por las que las herramientas de AppSec no se utilizan como cabría esperar, y se trata menos de las herramientas y su funcionalidad, y más de cómo se integran con un programa de seguridad en su conjunto.

Kamer van Koophandel shares how it embedded secure coding into everyday development through role-based certifications, Trust Score benchmarking, and a culture of shared security ownership.

See how Paysafe's partnership with Secure Code Warrior led to a 45% boost in developer productivity and a major reduction in code vulnerabilities.

DigitalOcean's use of Secure Code Warrior training has significantly reduced security debt, allowing teams to focus more on innovation and productivity. The improved security has strengthened their product quality and competitive edge. Looking ahead, the SCW Trust Score will help them further enhance security practices and continue driving innovation.

Secure code should be grounded more in concepts like secure by default and secure by design than by “spot the vuln” thinking. Matias Madou shares his experience in secure coding training and the importance of teaching critical thinking. He also discusses why critical thinking is so closely related to threat modeling and how LLMs can be a tool for helping developers get beyond the superficial advice of, “Think like an attacker.”

Organizations are at an inflection point driven by the explosive adoption of AI, which promises significant changes in how businesses operate. That leaves CISOs on unsteady ground. As the gatekeepers of their organization’s data and access, they must ensure the security of the enterprise. However, the prospects of a headlong charge into wide-ranging, and possibly unchecked, use of AI could create a flood of security issues that many CISOs, under their current organizational structures, aren’t equipped to handle.

Security leaders and developers alike are already acutely aware that AI coding assistants and agentic agents can introduce vulnerabilities into the code they generate. A recent study unveiled another critical concern to keep them up at night — LLMs used for making iterative code improvements may introduce new vulnerabilities over time, even when explicitly asked to make code more secure.

AI risk doesn't stop at engineering. Get the one-pager on Citizen AI — build AI literacy and safe habits across your whole workforce.

From AI autocomplete to autonomous agents—explore how software development is evolving and what it means for security, governance, and your team.

Gartner named SCW twice in the 2026 Hype Cycle for Secure Software Engineering. Here's why it matters for AI-driven development.